Quick Upload

Site and Soil Evaluation and Soil Protection

from andykleinschmidt, 1 month ago Add as contact

105 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 1 embeds (Stats)

Presentation given at 2008 Northwest Ohio Environmental Health Association Fall Conference on November 14, 2008 at Kalahari Resorts, Sandusky.

Embed customize close
 

More Info

This slideshow is Public

Views: 105 Comments: 0 Favorites: 0 Downloads: 2

View Details: 98 on Slideshare
7 from embeds
Most viewed embeds (Top 5): (…more)
All Embeds: (less)
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
Post to Blogger Post to Blogger
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons

Presentation Transcript

  1. Slide 1: Site and Soil Evaluation and Soil Protection Andy Kleinschmidt OSU Extension, Van Wert County 419-238-1214 (office) 419-203-5967 (cell) kleinschmidt.5@osu.edu or andykleinschmidt@gmail.com
  2. Slide 9: Proposed septic field
  3. Slide 11: Okay . . . . . . Now for a little diversion
  4. Slide 12: Inches water/ft soil Plant Available Water 4 3 2 1 Sand Sandy Silt Clay Clay loam loam loam
  5. Slide 13: Available Water Holding Capacity Storage capacity Texture (in./ft.) Silty clay loam 1.8 Clay loam 1.8 Silt loam 2.0 Silty clay 1.6 Sandy loam 1.4 Rhoads and Yonts, 1984.
  6. Slide 14: Texture and Pore Space Comparison of Coarse Textured and Fine Textured Soils Coarse Textured Soil Fine Textured Soil Less porespace but More total porespace more macropores
  7. Slide 15: Granular Small Polyhedrons or Spheroids Bounded by Curved or Irregular Surfaces Symbol for Structure (gr)
  8. Slide 16: GRANULAR
  9. Slide 17: Blocky Subangular or Angular Subangular Blocky – the three dimensions are about the same size, but polyhedrons are subrounded. Symbol (sbk) Angular Blocky – the three dimensions are about the same size, but edges are shape and faces appear flattened. Symbol (abk)
  10. Slide 18: BLOCKY
  11. Slide 19: Bulk Density Determination { } For our example, let’s Soil is made assume we have 1 cubic of solids and 1.33 centimeter of soil that pore spaces grams weighs 1.33 grams To calculate Bulk Density: Volume = 1 cm3 1.33 Bulk Density = Weight = 1.33 grams 1 Weight of Soil Bulk Density = 1.33 grams/cm3 Bulk Density = Volume of Soil
  12. Slide 20: Bulk Density (con’t.) Bulk density (g/cm3) Soil Cropped Uncropped Hagerstown loam (PA) 1.25 (50%) 1.07 (57%) Marshall silt loam (IA) 1.13 (56%) 0.93 (63%) Nappanese silt loam (OH) 1.31 (51%) 1.05 (60%) What impact does this have on pore space? Data from Lyon et al.
  13. Slide 21: Bulk Density and Compaction Depth Bulk Density (g/cm3) 0 inches 1.43 Plow layer 1.90 7 inches 8 inches 1.87 Compacted 9 inches 1.84 zone 10 inches 1.80 Uncompacted 1.60 subsoil 2.20 Till Data from Camp and Lund
  14. Slide 22: Some Common Bulk Densities • Uncultivated/undisturbed woodlots – 1.0 to 1.2 g/cm3 • Cultivated clay and silt loams – 1.1 to 1.5 g/cm3 • Cultivated sandy loams – 1.3 to 1.7 g/cm3 • Compacted glacial till – 1.9 to 2.2 g/cm3 • Concrete – 2.4 g/cm3
  15. Slide 23: What do you notice about this soil core? macropores
  16. Slide 24: Preferential Flow Soil Horizon A Example of 68% of leachable Initial storm of pesticide leaching through was lost atrazine season. to preferential preferential flow. Notice flow during the first storm. flow. preferential Atrazine applied. B What are the implications from a treatment standpoint? Calculated from Kladivco, et al. (1999); models from Cornell
  17. Slide 25: What ‘stands out’ about the landscape?
  18. Slide 26: Soil Color, Soil Aeration or Drainage, and the Oxidation State of Iron POOR AERATION GOOD AERATION 1. Iron is reduced 1. Iron is oxidized 2. Fe++ 2. Fe+++ 3. dull colors (grays, 3. bright colors blue) (yellows, browns) 4. poorly drained 4. well drained
  19. Slide 30: Okay . . . . . . Back to the site and soil evalution.
  20. Slide 33: Not suitable . . . • Wetland • Poor soil structure • Flood prone • Extremely shallow to bedrock • Recently disturbed • Excessively gravelly • What else makes a site not suitable?
  21. Slide 34: Approx. 1.1 acre
  22. Slide 36: Summary • Surface view looked promising • Standing corn stalks- looked good PIT • Did not visually see any ‘drowned’ out areas • Mapped Pewamo • Very weak and or no soil structure – high clay Approx. 1.1 acre • No system will work here (except for city services) PIT
  23. Slide 37: Approx. 20 acres
  24. Slide 39: Ohio Rapid Assessment Method • Provides for a quantitative wetland assessment of a parcel • Does not replace a formal wetland delineation • Allows for categorizing wetlands: Category 1, 2, or 3. • Training and additional information online at: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/wetlands/Wetlan dEcologySection.html#Training
  25. Slide 41: Keep all traffic off the soil absorption fields (including construction traffic), especially when saturated or if there is snow cover.
  26. Slide 42: • Do not discharge from basement footing drains or other clean water sources into the soil absorption fields. • Divert downspouts and other rainwater drainage away from the soil absorption fields. The extra rainwater can overwhelm the system. • Establish a grass cover over the soil absorption fields as soon as possible after installation to prevent erosion and promote plant uptake of water. • Avoid planting trees on or adjacent to the soil absorption fields. • Keep pavement, decks, above ground pools, and out buildings off of and away from the soil absorption fields. Construction activity can compact the soil and the structures limit access to the septic system or soil absorption fields for maintenance. • Never put additional fill over the soil absorption fields.